PL EN
Strengthening of the EU’s Common Security Policy as a source of possible conflict in Transatlantic relations
 
Więcej
Ukryj
 
Data publikacji: 20-05-2026
 
 
Myśl Strategiczna 2026;5(1):117-136
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE
The idea of a common EU security policy, originating from the so called Pleven Plan announced in October 1950, has experienced many ups and downs. Never fully realized, it is now subject to two opposing impulses. The first was the dramatic deterioration of the European security environment caused by Russia’s aggression against Ukraine; the second, President Trump’s announcement that the American “security umbrella” over European NATO members would be conditional on their radical increase in defence spending. Analysing the United States’ attitude toward its European allies, the article points out that throughout nearly the entire existence of NATO, this attitude has also been subject to significant fluctuations. This attitude results from the interplay of two conflicting needs: maintaining an adequate level of the United States’ own military equipment resources and retaining the ability to influence the decisions of its allies. The strength of this influence, apart from the level of the threat environment and the state of American resources, is also conditioned by the allies’ capacity to acquire military equipment. The current international situation has made most European NATO states realize that their armed forces are unable to fulfil their primary task – defending their own territory – and that domestic defence industries cannot rapidly supply the necessary equipment for this purpose.
REFERENCJE (25)
1.
Badhwar C., Europe needs to keep buying American, https://cepa.org/article/europ... [access: 18.02.2025].
 
2.
Blankenship B.D., The burden-sharing dilemma: Coercive diplomacy in US alliance politics, London 2023.
 
3.
Burilkov A., Mejino-Lopez J., Wolff G.B., The US defence industrial base can no longer reliably supply Europe, https://www.bruegel.org/analys... [access: 5.03.2025].
 
4.
Clapp S. et al., ReArm Europe Plan/Readiness 2023, „EPRS Briefing” 2025, no. 4.
 
5.
Deni J., NATO and Article 5: The Transatlantic Alliance and the twenty-first-century challenges of collective defense, Lanham 2017.
 
6.
Djokic K., Are the European NATO states moving towards self-reliance in arms procurement?, https://www.sipri.org/commenta... [access: 19.03.2025].
 
7.
Giles K., Who will defend Europe? An awakened Russia and a sleeping continent, London 2024.
 
8.
Gwadera Z., US allies question extended deterrence guarantees, but have few options,.
 
9.
 
10.
Haglund D.G., Alliance within alliance? Franco-German military cooperation and the European pilar of defense, New York 2018.
 
11.
Hallams E., The United States and NATO since 9/11: The Transatlantic Alliance renewed, New York 2010.
 
12.
Herszenhorn D.M., Macron wants Europe to buy its own military hardware, https://www.politico.eu/articl... [access: 5.03.2025].
 
13.
Inoguchi T., Ikenberry J., Sato Y., The U.S.–Japan Security Alliance, Cham 2011.
 
14.
Koivula T., Ossa H., NATO’s Burden-sharing disputes: Past, Present and Future Prospects, Cham 2022.
 
15.
Lansford T., Tashev B., Old Europe, new Europe and the US: Renegotiating Transatlantic Security in the post 9/11 era, Burlington 2005.
 
16.
Longhurst K., Zaborowski M., Old Europe, new Europe and the transatlantic security agenda, New York 2005.
 
17.
Messmer M., Will Germany rearm quickly enough?, Chatham House Expert Comment, 26.07.2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2... [access: 15.04.2025].
 
18.
Priebe M., et al., Balancing Act – How Allies Have responded to limited U.S. Retrenchment, https://www.rand.org/pubs/rese... [access: 30.10.2025].
 
19.
Progress and shortfalls in Europe’s defence, an assessment, An IISS strategic dossier, London 2025.
 
20.
Ratti L., NATO and the CSDP after the Ukraine war: the end of European strategic autonomy?, „Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies” 2023, no. 2.
 
21.
Rohac D., Castellet Nogues E., Funding Europe’s firepower: how the EU can funnel Its wealth into its defence, Foreign Affairs 19.09.2025, https://www.aei.org/op-eds/fix....
 
22.
[access: 5.03.2025].
 
23.
Rynning S., NATO: From cold war to Ukraine, a history of the world’s most powerful alliance, London 2024.
 
24.
Shane L., US Forces Korea commander defends troop levels amid talk of cuts. Military Times, https://www.militarytimes.com/... [access: 30.10.2025].
 
25.
Slattery G., Irish J., Psaledakis D., US officials object to European push to buy weapons locally, https://www.reuters.com/world/... [access: 12.11.2025].
 
ISSN:3071-9305
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top